Judgment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Judgment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

In non-legal contexts, a judgment (American English) or judgement (British English) is a balanced weighing up of evidence preparatory to making a decision.

[edit] Background

In formulating cognitive judgments, a formal process of evaluation applies. A judgment may be expressed as a statement, e.g. S1: 'A is B' and is usually the outcome of an evaluation of alternatives. The formal process of evaluation can sometimes be described as a set of conditions and criteria that must be satisfied in order for a judgment to be made. What follows is a suggestive list of some conditions that are commonly required:

  • there must be corroborating evidence for S1,
  • there must be no true contradicting statements,
  • if there are contradicting statements, these must be outweighed by the corroborating evidence for S1, or
  • contradicting statements must themselves have no corroborating evidence
  • S1 must also corroborate and be corroborated by the system of statements which are accepted as true.

Without a rigorous analysis, a rigid set of criteria to all forms of judgment. Often this results in unnecessary restrictions to judgment methodologies, excluding what may otherwise be considered legitimate judgments. For analogous difficulties in science and the scientific method see the Wikipedia entry on the scientific method.

From the criteria mentioned above, we could judge that "It is raining" if there are raindrops hitting the window, if people outside are using umbrellas, and if there are clouds in the sky. Someone who says that despite all this, it is not raining, but cannot provide evidence for this, would not undermine our judgment.

However, if they demonstrated that there was a sophisticated projection and audio system to produce the illusion of our evidence, then we would probably reconsider our judgment. However, we would not do this lightly, we would demand evidence of the existence of such a system. Then it would need to be decided again upon available new evidence whether or not it was raining.

Many forms of judgment, including the above example, require that they be supported by, and support, known facts which are themselves well supported, and its negation must be shown to be unfounded, before it is accepted as well founded.

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

Personal tools
Wikipedia wpisuje siÄ™ w nurt tworzenia wolnych i otwartych treÅ›ci, zainspirowany dziaÅ‚aniami informatyków tworzÄ…cych oprogramowanie wolne i o otwartym kodzie źródÅ‚owym (FLOSS). Jak w wypadku wielu tego typu projektów, otwartość internetowej encyklopedii zaowocowaÅ‚a szybkim wzrostem. W ciÄ…gu piÄ™ciu lat Wikipedia przyciÄ…gnęła dziesiÄ…tki tysiÄ™cy autorów i redaktorów, którzy stworzyli ponad trzy miliony haseÅ‚ w 100 jÄ™zykach. Nieproporcjonalnie duża część pracy jest wykonywana przez stosunkowo niewielkÄ… grupÄ™ 4500 osób, z których 1850 pracuje nad wersjÄ… angielskÄ…. Wersja ta jest już kilkakrotnie wiÄ™ksza od dowolnej tradycyjnej encyklopedii (zarówno pod wzglÄ™dem objÄ™toÅ›ci, jak i liczby haseÅ‚), a 13 najwiÄ™kszych wersji jÄ™zykowych, w tym polska, zawiera ponad 50 tysiÄ™cy haseÅ‚. kursy internetowe # obozy m³odzie¿owe # papuga Papugi papu¿ka # Akustyka # Tygrysy pozycjonowanie humor zus poÅ›ciel atrakcje turystyczne w Polsce porównywarka cen